Changes
no edit summary
<p>Self-Evaluation of SungHyun Byun for 2018-2<sup>nd</sup> semester Genomics.</p>
<p><strong>1. Abstract</strong></p>
<p>SungHyun Byun took2018-2<sup>nd</sup> semester Genomics class. It is quite different class compared to other biology classes, because it is based on SELF study and discuss sessions. And students required to evaluate themselves based on scientific results and criteria. Based on following criteria, SungHyun's final grade will be B+</p>
<p><strong>2. Grading Policy</strong></p>
<p>The basically used evaluation criteria for the evaluation is like following :</p>
<p>And this is my opinion for each factors</p>
<p><strong>-1. Attendance (18/20)</strong></p>
<p>: I absent total two classes except the first week of the class, which is not mandatory according to UNIST attendance policy. Therefore, I deduct 2 points, and 10 points is the basic marks. </p>
<p><strong>-2. Participation (13/20)</strong></p>
<p>: The professor asked several questions in the class, and I answered several times. And I gave a comment to other students' questions sometimes. However, I didn't ask questions or discuss the topic actively, so I can't give good points on the participation parts. </p>
<p><strong>-3. Report and Essays (45/60)</strong></p>
<p>: I prepared 2 presentation file related with genomics and 1 poster contents which is not directly related with genomics. I planned to gave a presentation in the class in front of the students and professor, but unfortunately I can't. I want to discuss the topics that I select from the article. That points is the key black mark for grading. If I gave a presentation in the class about the topic, it can get good grades, whether the contents good or not, because the willingness to share the idea as a student who study science is very important. In that respect, I think I have failed part of it. In conclusion, I gave only 45 points in report and essays section. </p>