Difference between revisions of "Self Evaluation"

From Biolecture.org
imported>Yunseok Han
(Created page with "<p>Self-Evaluation of Yunseok Han for 2016-1<sup>st</sup> semester Bioinformatics</p> <p>The basically used evaluation criteria for the evaluation is the 11 questions in “...")
 
imported>SungHyun Byun
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<p>Self-Evaluation of Yunseok Han for 2016-1<sup>st</sup> semester Bioinformatics</p>
+
<p>Self-Evaluation of SungHyun Byun for 2018-2<sup>nd</sup> semester Genomics.</p>
  
−
<p>The basically used evaluation criteria for the evaluation is the 11 questions in &ldquo;SELF check points for students&rdquo;<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1" title="">[1]</a> as the criteria suggested by the professor who gave this course. The answer for some of the questions, &ldquo;2. Did I think a lot about the subject(such as bioinformatics)?&rdquo;, &ldquo;3. Did I think of questions out of my own logical ramifications?&rdquo;, &ldquo;5. Did I did homework voluntarily with fun? &ldquo;, &ldquo;6. Did I develop my own ideas? &ldquo;, &ldquo;7. Did I contribute to the class and our mates?&rdquo;, &ldquo;8. Did I present anything in the class?&rdquo;, and &ldquo;9. Did I make the class more exciting by active participation?&rdquo; is &lsquo;No, I didn&rsquo;t&rsquo;, since I did not in real and there is no evidence that shows I did. This result shows the answer for the first question, &ldquo;1. Do I love the subject?&rdquo;, is &lsquo;No, I do&rsquo;, since I think a lot about the subject and do actively with fun for the subject if I really love the subject. The answer for other two questions, &ldquo;4. Did I follow the instructions of the teacher?&rdquo;, &ldquo;10. Did I learn the most important aspects of the course? &ldquo;, and &ldquo;11. Is my communication in the subject field improved?&rdquo; is &lsquo;Yes&rsquo;. As an evidence of the answer for the question 4, there are my email address and summary of the given lectures in my page for this course<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2" title="">[2]</a>. Also, the lecture summary is an evidence for the question 11, since that means I got to know little part of that field although it just a word for the subject field. There is no reliable exact evidence that shows the answer is true, but I learned that scientists must have their own scientific philosophy. The result for the basically used criteria is seven &lsquo;No&rsquo; and four &lsquo;Yes&rsquo; which means I did not well enough to have a good grade for the course and the questions answered &lsquo;No&rsquo; indicates that I did lower performance for this course. However, I know basic knowledge as a person who took this course as the questions answered &lsquo;Yes&rsquo; indicates, which means that I got the information of bioinformatics even though I just listened and noted shortly only about the given lecture and the important aspect to think as a scientist. Therefore, the result of the self-evaluation is B0.</p>
+
<p>The basically used evaluation criteria for the evaluation is like following :</p>
  
−
<div>&nbsp;
+
<p>[[ Attendance : 20%</p>
−
<hr />
 
−
<div id="ftn1">
 
−
<p><a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1" title="">[1]</a> <a href="http://biolecture.org/index.php/SELF_check_points_for_students">http://biolecture.org/index.php/SELF_check_points_for_students</a> Jong Bhak</p>
 
−
</div>
 
  
−
<div id="ftn2">
+
<p>Participation : 20%</p>
−
<p><a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2" title="">[2]</a> http://biolecture.org/index.php/Yunseok_Han</p>
+
 
−
</div>
+
<p>Report and Essays : 60% ]]</p>
−
</div>
+
 
 +
<p>And this is my opinion for each factors</p>
 +
 
 +
<p><strong>1. Attendance (18/20)</strong></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>: I absent total two classes except the first week of the class, which is not mandatory according to UNIST attendance policy. Therefore, I deduct 2 points, and 10 points is the basic marks.&nbsp;</p>
 +
 
 +
<p><strong>2. Participation (12/20)</strong></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>: The professor asked several questions in the class, and I answered several times. And I gave a comment to other students&#39; questions sometimes. However, I didn&#39;t ask questions or discuss the topic actively, so I can&#39;t give good points on the participation parts.&nbsp;</p>
 +
 
 +
<p><strong>3. Report and Essays (45/60)</strong></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>: I prepared 2 presentation file related with genomics and 1 poster contents which is not directly related with genomics. I planned to gave a presentation in the class in front of the students and professor, but unfortunately I can&#39;t. I want to discuss the topics that I select from the article. That points is the key black mark for grading. If I gave a presentation in the class about the topic, it can get good grades, whether the contents good or not, because the willingness to share the idea as a student who study science is very important. In that respect, I think I have failed part of it. In conclusion, I gave only 45 points in report and essays section.&nbsp;</p>
 +
 
 +
<p><strong>Total : (75/100)</strong></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>[[ A+ : 95 - 100</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>A0 : 90 - 95</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>A- : 80 - 90</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>B+ : 75- 80</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>B0 : 70 - 75</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>B- : 60 - 70</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>C+ : 50 -60</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>C0 : 40 - 50</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>C- : 30 - 40</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>D+&nbsp;: 20 - 30</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>D0 : 10 - 20</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>D- : 0 - 10 ]]</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Based on the critetia, I evalate myself as grade B+ or B0.&nbsp;</p>
 +
 
 +
<div>&nbsp;</div>

Revision as of 02:27, 7 December 2018

Self-Evaluation of SungHyun Byun for 2018-2nd semester Genomics.

The basically used evaluation criteria for the evaluation is like following :

[[ Attendance : 20%

Participation : 20%

Report and Essays : 60% ]]

And this is my opinion for each factors

1. Attendance (18/20)

: I absent total two classes except the first week of the class, which is not mandatory according to UNIST attendance policy. Therefore, I deduct 2 points, and 10 points is the basic marks. 

2. Participation (12/20)

: The professor asked several questions in the class, and I answered several times. And I gave a comment to other students' questions sometimes. However, I didn't ask questions or discuss the topic actively, so I can't give good points on the participation parts. 

3. Report and Essays (45/60)

: I prepared 2 presentation file related with genomics and 1 poster contents which is not directly related with genomics. I planned to gave a presentation in the class in front of the students and professor, but unfortunately I can't. I want to discuss the topics that I select from the article. That points is the key black mark for grading. If I gave a presentation in the class about the topic, it can get good grades, whether the contents good or not, because the willingness to share the idea as a student who study science is very important. In that respect, I think I have failed part of it. In conclusion, I gave only 45 points in report and essays section. 

Total : (75/100)

[[ A+ : 95 - 100

A0 : 90 - 95

A- : 80 - 90

B+ : 75- 80

B0 : 70 - 75

B- : 60 - 70

C+ : 50 -60

C0 : 40 - 50

C- : 30 - 40

D+ : 20 - 30

D0 : 10 - 20

D- : 0 - 10 ]]

Based on the critetia, I evalate myself as grade B+ or B0. 

 
Retrieved from "http://Biolecture.org/index.php?title=Self_Evaluation&oldid=9817"