56
edits
Changes
no edit summary
== '''Abstract''' Introduction ==
== Method and Result ==
<span style="font-size:18px;">I used instructor's [[GuidelineSELF_check_points_for_students|guideline]], my research presentation ([https://Biolecture.org/upload/20231208153750_Heterochromatin assembly without ultralong reads 2023 OMICS COURSE SELF.pptx]) and my [[Changhan_Yoon|https://biolecture.org/Changhan's_thoughts wiki page]] to evaluate myself during the course.<br/> I curated the questions to make evaluation more concise to reduce some similar questions.<br/> I set the checkpoints as following.<br/> <br/> 1. Do I love/like the subject? Yes<br/> 2. Attendance 9/14<br/> 3. Did I think of questions out of my own logical ramifications? Yes<br/> 4. Did I write many scientific reports? No<br/> 5. Did I develop my own ideas? Yes<br/> 6. Was this course helpful to my own research? Yes<br/> 7. Did I present anything in the class? Yes<br/> 8. Did I make the class more exciting by active participation? Yes<br/> 9. Is my communication in the subject field improved? Yes<br/> 10. Is my Enlgish writing skill suitable for a colleage student? No<br/> <br/> Score: 7/10 B+</span> == Conclusion == <span style="font-size:18px;">This omics course influenced the [https://biolecture.org/Changhan's_thoughts| theory of information propagation between omics layers]. To investigate information propagation between omics layers, I tried to build a new KOREF genome assembly in a T2T level. Although T2T KOREF assembly was not achieved due to the lack of ultra-long reads, this course helped the T2T KOREF genome project to resume.</span> == Discussion == <span style="font-size:18px;">There are two points that I missed during the course. First, I did not write reports. Second, since I did not write in English, my English skill was not improved.</span>